IDEA-001 v002 — independent evidence review

Independent Sol pass found no material correctness defects; source resource bound failed and performance remains unverified.

ReviewDraft record

Reviewer and review event

Independent reviewer: codex/gpt-6.1-sol, medium effort, role reviewer, agent /root/evidence_review. Review performed 2026-10-09 America/Los_Angeles and recorded here by the parent from the returned report. The reviewer read twelve assigned deliverable/profile documents, inspected exact local captures and did not edit files or retrieve external evidence. No human review is asserted.

Findings and acceptance distinction

The reviewer reported no material correctness defects. Original documentation deliverables were substantively satisfied, conditional on recording this review and final parent validation: co-founder evidence, four-subject matrix, gap register/unsent request, archived provenance and synthesis.²³⁷

Resource compliance failed: thirteen unique new URLs exceeded twelve approved. Source accounting and both worker manifests disclose the cap-crossing batch and ineffective late reallocation. Captures remain preserved; accounting order is not asserted as asynchronous completion order. No retrospective approval is claimed. Manager permitted only unaffected synthesis/review on already preserved material. Completion of deliverables does not cure this resource-bound nonconformance.⁶¹

Material traces checked

BlueBird: analog-video observations; displayed frequency/channel/RSSI; optional 3.0 and included 4.0 video output; OTA firmware updating; Monitor-mode scan interruption; approximate app location; personal-use app license and necessity-based app retention. Structured export, target coordinates, detector retention and data entitlements correctly remain unestablished.⁴
DroneSight: ASTM F3411 restriction, map controls, host diagnostics and asserted uploaded-data ownership. Map visibility remains separate from API/bulk rights and retention.⁵
Dronetag: pilot/takeoff substitution, authentication, bounded REST queries, conditional push access and delivery controls. NRID 12-month retention is not transferred to receiver history.⁵
BlueMark: epoch-millisecond timestamps, absent RTC and NTP/GNSS dependence, sensor-location messages, encoded UASdata/validity flags, aggregation/batching and conflicting interval wording. Repository code-license labeling remains separate from observation-data rights.⁵

Integrity and review limits

Reviewer recomputed scope v002 SHA-256 and matched both receipts. Scoped absolute evidence links resolved. Twenty-seven successful captures across twenty-six cited source records matched recorded byte counts and SHA-256; these integrity checks do not verify source claims. Counts include reused evidence/canonical-profile citations, not just this phase's new captures.

No independent field-performance confirmation, authenticated-service inspection, hardware testing, legal assessment or external retrieval occurred. Partial web text, missing BlueBird PDFs, absent BlueMark figures and uninspected binary-member layouts limit negative findings. Existing canonical-profile legacy prices were not comprehensively reverified; review focused the approved data/access follow-up. No repository-wide validation was run by reviewer; parent records it separately in brief/change register.

Outcome

No material fix or second review pass was required. Parent may mark original deliverables complete after final validation, while retaining explicit resource nonconformance and no permission for further work.

Approved scope v002; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩
Summary; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩
Four-subject data/access matrix; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩
Co-founder evidence; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩
Comparison evidence; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩↩↩
Source accounting; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩
Prioritized gaps and unsent request; exact supporting captures and limitations are linked in that document. ↩

Sources, provenance and record details

Record type: Review
Status: draft
Generated: by: codex/gpt-6 at: '2026-10-10T05:39:25+00:00'
Recorded checks: No verification metadata recorded.

Sources

All record metadata

type: Review
title: IDEA-001 v002 — independent evidence review
description: Independent Sol pass found no material correctness defects; source resource
  bound failed and performance remains unverified.
status: draft
generated:
  by: codex/gpt-6
  at: '2026-10-10T05:39:25+00:00'
sources:
- id: scope/v002
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/scope/v002.md
  title: Approved scope v002
- id: summary
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/summary.md
  title: Summary
- id: data-access-matrix
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/data-access-matrix.md
  title: Four-subject data/access matrix
- id: cofounder-detector-evidence
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/cofounder-detector-evidence.md
  title: Co-founder evidence
- id: comparison-evidence
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/comparison-evidence.md
  title: Comparison evidence
- id: source-manifest
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/source-manifest.md
  title: Source accounting
- id: gap-register
  resource: /docs/project-information/ideas/IDEA-001-community-detector-network/gap-register.md
  title: Prioritized gaps and unsent request