IDEA-001 scope v002 — co-founder detector data and access evidence
Revised follow-up on co-founder detector observations, interfaces and contributor access.
Objective and decision served
Identify what evidence is available or still needed to define IDEA-001's data contribution and access model. Recommend the next evidence request, without choosing hardware, a launch market or a commercial model. This proposed follow-up serves the user's current data-gathering focus.2
Deliverables and acceptance criteria
- Co-founder detector evidence brief: use “BlueBird” and “Chuika” as corrected by the user and treat their co-founder role as user-confirmed context. Inventory available detector documentation and missing technical details; do not investigate identity candidates or require external verification of that relationship. Exact entity/person/product mapping may remain unspecified.4
- Data and access matrix: compare the partner evidence with DroneSight, Dronetag and BlueMark, using existing canonical profiles first. Cover observation type, exportable fields, timestamps, location/uncertainty, interfaces, sample/schema availability, retention, quality/uptime conditions and documented use/redistribution rights. Mark every unknown and distinguish contributor visibility from API or bulk database access. These are a bounded follow-up subset of RES-001, not a new landscape scan.3
- Gap register and recommendation: prioritize unanswered questions and draft a short partner information request for the user to review; do not send it. List possible meanings of “whole database” without selecting one. Preserve the $10 monthly payment as a proposal with unresolved currency, payment unit and eligibility.1
Each substantive claim must distinguish user context, vendor claims, independent evidence and analysis, with dated claim-level citations to exact archived evidence. A missing document or unknown technical detail is an acceptable finding. Deliver an independent evidence review, recorded capture limitations and passing knowledge validation; no claim of field-performance verification.
Included work and exclusions
Included after both gates: targeted desk research and inspection of public documentation or user-supplied, authorized files for the four subjects above. Existing RES-001 is completed pre-gate work; reuse and cite it without rerunning or retrospectively approving it.3
Excluded: broad competitor discovery; purchases, paid APIs, account creation or credential use; vendor/partner outreach; authenticated feeds or bulk personal/location data collection; code, live detector integration, field tests, network design, cost/coverage modelling, legal conclusions, launch-market selection, publication or recurring monitoring. No actual database access or redistribution permission is assumed. Any material expansion needs a new scope version and both gates.
Evidence, data access, resources and dependencies
Start with preserved inputs, RES-001 and canonical profiles. Bound new gathering to at most 12 distinct public source URLs across the four subjects; archive all gathered materials, including relevant background. Prefer official specifications, schemas and terms; use independent evidence where available. Search results guide discovery and do not substitute for captures. Stop at the bound and report gaps rather than silently extending the scan.
The co-founder relationship is supplied by the user; technical specifications, schemas and data-use permissions still require documentation.4 Geography is unspecified: compare documented access and collection mechanisms internationally, label geographic limits and defer launch-country permission analysis.
Proposed execution uses Sol for bounded research, at most two researchers with separate files/source ownership, and one independent Sol reviewer. No paid services or hardware spend; ordinary model usage is unmetered here and no monetary ceiling is claimed. The manager must assign shared reference/canonical-profile ownership before execution; this chat currently owns only the IDEA-001 folder. Future findings, matrix, gap register and review stay here, while shared evidence/profile changes require explicit coordinator allocation. No duplicate company profiles.
Open questions and assumptions
- Optional input: existing BlueBird/Chuika detector specifications or export/schema documents would support technical review. Their absence becomes a recorded evidence gap, not identity speculation.4
- “Whole database” and the $10 proposal remain questions for later decisions; their clarification is not required to document available evidence.1
- Working assumption: retain the data-gathering focus and defer later-stage ideas. “Flightradar” remains the earlier study's provisional Flightradar24 interpretation.23
Change from previous scope
Supersedes proposed v001. The user clarified “BlueBird Chuika are our co-founders.” This changes the identity-investigation deliverable: accept the relationship as user context and focus on technical data/interface evidence. Original inputs and v001 remain unchanged. This material deliverable amendment requires approval of v002; no approval of v001 or earlier work is asserted.4
Approval request
Approve or amend v002 in this owning chat. Explicit user approval must be recorded separately with this file's path and SHA-256, followed by the manager's separate recorded start authorization. This snapshot will not be edited after publication; amendments create v003.
-
Preserved original user proposal; partner identity and capabilities are user-provided context, not independent confirmation. ↩↩
-
Preserved 2026-10-09 data-gathering direction; later-stage ideas remain with the user. ↩↩
-
Completed RES-001 synthesis and its stated evidence limitations; no new external research was conducted to prepare this scope. ↩↩↩
-
Exact user correction preserved in the dated co-founder input; no technical capabilities or data entitlements are inferred. ↩↩↩↩